EmailMeForm
ED 326/ 382 Remedial Reading
Field Experience Evaluation - Updated Fall 22
REMEDIAL READING FE EVALUATION FOR
ACADEMIC YEAR 2023 -2024
Wartburg Student Name
*
First
Last
Midterm or Final
*
Midterm
Final
Field Experience Evaluation Term
*
2024 Winter Term
Supervising Teacher
*
First
Last
Supervising Teacher's Class/Grade
*
Supervising Teacher's School
*
Supervising Teacher's School District
*
This course is required for all Elementary Education students seeking their Reading endorsement. Typically completed by 3rd-year Education students, the field experience provides students with the opportunity to plan, and engage in, a variety of intervention strategies. As upper-level students in the Wartburg Teacher Education Program, it is expected that students demonstrate increasing aptitude and ability throughout the semester. 2’s or 3’s at mid-term will hopefully become 3’s or 4’s by the final evaluation. However, any time supervising teachers indicate a “1,” faculty will address this concern with the student. Any “1’s” on the final evaluation may result in the student receiving a 'Notice of Concern' in their permanent file and potentially failing the field experience portion of the course.
1. Planning
Develops standards-based lesson plans with clear objectives
*
4-Exemplary: Designs consistently detailed lesson plans with observable, measurable objectives connected to larger learning goals
3-Proficient: Most lesson plans include observable, measurable objectives connected to larger learning goals
2-Developing: With assistance can write lesson plans with observable, measurable objectives connected to larger learning goals
1-Recommend Intervention: Consistently struggles to prepare lesson plans with observable, measurable objectives connected to larger learning goals
NA: Not applicable at this time
2. Instruction
Activates prior knowledge and encourages active student engagement
*
4-Exemplary: Opening sequence consistently connects learners to prior, or common, knowledge
3-Proficient: Most opening sequences consistently connect learners to prior, or common, knowledge
2-Developing: With assistance can relate opening sequence to learners' prior, or common, knowledge
1-Recommend Intervention: Consistently struggles to connect new learning to prior knowledge of learners
NA: Not applicable at this time
Implements lessons according to plans
*
4-Exemplary: Lessons consistently follow plan, including specific plans for differentiation and intervention during instruction
3-Proficient: Lessons usually follow plan, including appropriate plans for differentiation during instruction
2-Developing: Lessons usually follow plan, but is limited in application for students
1-Recommend Intervention: Consistently struggles to follow lesson plan to reach identified goals
NA: Not applicable at this time
3. Assessment
Uses informal strategies to identify student learning and modify instruction
*
4-Exemplary: Consistently uses a variety of formative and/ or summative methods to identify progress toward learning goals
3-Proficient: Utilizes appropriate formative and/ or summative methods to identify progress toward learning goals
2-Developing: With guidance, can utilizes formative and/ or summative methods to identify progress toward learning goals
1-Recommend Intervention:Struggles to implement formative and/ or summative methods to identify progress toward learning goals
NA: Not applicable at this time
4. Professional Responsibilities
Arrives on time, prepared, and ready to teach
*
4-Exemplary: Follows through with all scheduled observations, lessons, and responsibilities
3-Proficient: Present and prepared for most classroom meetings as planned, and communicates when schedule requires changes
2-Developing: Missed or not prepared for some scheduled lessons, with ineffective communication about the change
1-Recommend Intervention: Missed and/ or unprepared for several scheduled lessons, with no/ minimal communication
NA: Not applicable at this time
Improves based on teacher feedback and reflection
*
4-Exemplary: With maturity and professionalism, receives and acts upon suggestions for improving instruction
3-Proficient: Considers feedback, and adapts instructional strategies to improve over time
2-Developing: Discusses areas of improvement, but slow to implement suggestions for improvement
1-Recommend Intervention: Appears defensive or resistant to feedback and suggestions
NA: Not applicable at this time
Shows promise for being an effective Reading teacher
*
4-Exemplary: Demonstrates exceptional knowledge and skills for an upper-level Education student
3-Proficient: Demonstrates appropriate knowledge and skills for an upper-level Education student
2-Developing: Demonstrates a few concerns that will need to be monitored during student teaching
1-Recommend Intervention:Demonstrates several professional and/ or behavioral concerns that will need to be addressed prior to student teaching
NA: Not applicable at this time
COMMENTS
All comments are helpful but are especially important for 1 or 4 ratings. Students receiving 1 ratings will complete an intervention. Students receiving 4 ratings demonstrate exceptional promise. Thank you.
Please record your comments:
Date
*
MM
/
DD
/
YYYY
If you would like a copy of this evaluation, please include your email address below.
Confirm email address:
